首页> 外文OA文献 >Streambank erosion adjacent to different riparian land-use practices and stream patterns along Bear Creek, in north central Iowa
【2h】

Streambank erosion adjacent to different riparian land-use practices and stream patterns along Bear Creek, in north central Iowa

机译:爱荷华州中北部贝尔河沿岸的河岸侵蚀与不同的河岸土地使用方式和流型相邻

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Sediment load in streams is the major non-point source pollutant originating from agriculture landscapes. Bank erosion can contribute 45-60% of the sediment load in streams. Land-use practices such as row cropping and grazing, combined with channelization of meandering reaches of streams have accelerated bank erosion rates and increased the sediment load in streams. An 11 km reach of Bear Creek was selected to compare bank erosion and soil loss of riparian buffers, corn or soybean row-cropped fields and cow or horse pastures along meandering and channelized reaches. The pin method was used to measure bank erosion because it is very good for short time-scale studies with high resolution that capture small differences in bank erosion at relatively low cost. Thirty three erosion pin plots were randomly assigned to the land-use practice sites that contained approximately 1100 pins. The pins were measured approximately every month from June 1998 to May 1999. Bulk densities were estimated with the core method, while the length and average height of all the eroding sites were also measured. Bank erosion rates and soil losses were affected by land-use practices although bulk densities were not very different.;The highest bank erosion rates where on the outside bends of cattle grazed pastures and crop fields with losses of 33 and 34 cm yr−1. Buffered banks had the lowest erosion rates, with only 12 cm yr−1 lost. Cattle grazed pastures and crop fields lost 341 kg m−1and 288 kg m−1 while riparian buffers lost only 55 kg m−1. If the entire 11 km reach of Bear Creek had riparian multi-species buffers the bank soil loss would be reduced by 62 percent. Riparian buffers provide an alternative land-use practice that will reduce soil bank loss and sediment load in the streams while also being financially attractive to farmers because the Conservation Reserve Program subsidizes the agricultural land lost.
机译:河流中的泥沙负荷是源自农业景观的主要面源污染物。堤岸侵蚀可贡献河流中泥沙负荷的45-60%。耕作和放牧等土地利用做法与溪流蜿蜒河段的河道化相结合,加快了河岸侵蚀速度,增加了溪流中的泥沙负荷。选择了一条11公里的熊溪,以比较河岸缓冲带,玉米或大豆行耕地以及沿曲折河道和河道的牛或马牧场的河岸侵蚀和土壤流失。销钉法用于测量堤岸侵蚀,因为它对于高分辨率的短时间尺度研究非常有用,它可以以相对较低的成本捕获堤岸侵蚀的小差异。将33个侵蚀针地块随机分配到包含大约1100个针的土地使用实践场所。从1998年6月到1999年5月,大约每个月测量一次销钉。采用核方法估算堆密度,同时还测量所有侵蚀部位的长度和平均高度。银行侵蚀率和土壤流失受土地利用方式的影响,尽管容重差异不大。缓冲河岸侵蚀率最低,损失仅12 cm yrâ’’1。放牧的牛和草场损失了341 kgmâ1和288 kgmâ1,而河岸缓冲区仅损失了55 kgmâ1。如果Bear Creek的整个11公里范围都具有河岸多物种缓冲带,那么河岸土壤损失将减少62%。河岸缓冲带提供了一种替代性的土地利用方式,可以减少土壤库的流失和河流中的泥沙负荷,同时由于保护储备计划对流失的农业土地提供补贴,因此对农民在经济上也具有吸引力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Zaimes, George Nick;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1999
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号